One
question I did not address in the video was this:
Why bother to record the phone conversations?
The reason is simple. When a Witness is tried before a judicial
committee, there is no permanent record of the proceedings.
Many of my friends, including some who are active, faithful
Witnesses to this day, have been involved in judicial proceedings.
Most of them have felt that at least parts of the trials have
been unfair. On March 3, 2001, one friend told me: “If
you ever have any family problems, don’t go to the elders!”
That friend is still an active Witness. Another friend told
me that they felt they were unfairly punished; that the elders
“had it out for them” from the start.
When I would express concern that the judicial proceedings
of certain friends were not handled fairly, these concerns
were invariably suppressed. My family often told me that I
should not question the judgement of the elders and, in the
rare event that a case may have been handled improperly, they
would tell me that “Jehovah will take care of the matter
in his due time”. This struck me as odd; perhaps my
mention of the unfairness was Jehovah’s way of taking
care of the situation.
Another of my friends was disfellowshipped under trumped up
charges (a fact I confirmed from five sources). I explained
this to a relative, and on April 27, 2007, he argued thusly:
“You are assuming this. You don't know the whole story
since you were not in the committee room.” But, of course,
to discount the testimony of my friend and the five sources
would be to call them all liars. And, at any rate, elders
themselves are not above reproach. The book Jehovah’s
Witnesses – Proclaimers’ of God’s Kingdom
(published by the Watchtower, Bible and Tract Society, 1993)
says, on page 187: “Sadly, in recent times it has been
necessary to disfellowship tens of thousands of unrepentant
wrongdoers each year. Prominent elders have been included
among them.” (Italics mine.)
I often considered accounts like this when contemplating the
prospect that I could someday be called before a judicial
committee. Statistically speaking, the elders would not treat
me justly and fairly, so I wanted to ensure that no one would
ever accuse me of twisting their words. I did not want anyone
to say “Well I wasn’t in the committee meeting,
so I don’t know the whole story.” So I decided
to record all conversations that transpired between any elder
and me. The phone conversations presented here aren’t
the most scathing or shocking, but they are a permanent, documented
record of the dialogue. I almost wish that I had allowed the
matter to progress into a judicial hearing, so that I could
have asked more questions and recorded more information for
public listening.
I encourage anyone reading this who is (or will be) involved
in a judicial proceeding to record the events. A small tape
recorder is discreet, but the audio quality is somewhat lacking
and the tape often lasts only 30 minutes. Another option is
a camcorder. Though it is somewhat larger than a tape recorder,
the camcorder can be hidden inside a purse of briefcase. If
the conversation takes place via telephone, the camera can
be set on a tripod or a tabletop in the vicinity of the phone’s
mouthpiece. This is what I did and my only regret is not having
speakerphone capability. If you prefer to not be secretive,
request that you be allowed to record the proceedings, citing
biblical examples of recorded discipline as precedent. As
in my case, elders will not agree to this condition as it
conflicts with the direction they receive on page 110 of their
handbook (Pay Attention to Yourselves and to All the Flock,
1991), where it says: “No tape-recording devices are
allowed”. The handbook only prohibits tape, so it might
be best to ask if you can bring a computer along to record
directly onto your hard-drive.
If you do record your conversation(s), please contact me.
I will be happy to make it available on the worldwide web
should you lack the means to do so. Do not hide your light
“under the measuring basket” (Matthew 5:15)!